Relationship rather than EQ has to be the more central of the two key terms in the topic. This due to the realization that in this age of IR 4.0, relationship and simple communication is perhaps the most needed but underrated requirement. There are so many routes and facets that have been researched that we sometimes forget that it essentially humans playing out the role of senders and receivers with variables that will influence results greatly depending on the relationship status.
Thus t is just not apt but simply logical through the realization of the age old concept of ethos, pathos and logos plus kairos type logic to help persuade others or simply be in the right way in relationship. EQ generally means the ability to monitor one’s own and other people’s emotions, to discriminate between different emotions and label them appropriately and to use emotional information to guide thinking and this simply cannot happen unless we have the ability to have information is central to the mapping of the information.
Agreeably, it would be quite improbable to get all the necessary information prior to a communication process without proper human relationship and having EQ as a central theme or the OK+OK humans as a model would greatly reduce the gap. Thus, we would need to start with evaluating our EQ status and employ the right strategies to get us to be an EQ based organizations before the machines really take over.
